officegirl Wrote:I see the point of view for people voting for free, however, i would say that if everyone wanted free then there would be no sites, simply because all the images and videos have to come from somewhere, and lets face it, there arent many 18 year old girls that post on the internet in pantyhose because' they are into it' or they 'love the fetish' they are doing it because they get paid for it and if the paysites didn't pay for these images and videos to be made then there would be none available.

natasha
xxx

worng

i know queit a few gals who are 18 and have a pantyhose fetish.

in http://www.strumpfhose.net

there is some who are 16 too

what age got to do with being a ph fetish

In my mind I think that a paysite making money would invest into making better quality content. From this point of view.. some paysites have much better "content" than the free sites.
Free sites would have to pay for bandthwidth. So .. to cut down the costs .. they will tend to put short movies or small-frames-movies

We have a saying here : Pay a buck and stay in the front seat

Administrator Wrote:We have a saying here : Pay a buck and stay in the front seat

ture..i never been in a paysite...dunno whats in there attall..

saying paysites..how much is it in one..and how offten does it get updated.

Of course this depends by each paysite. I presume the more members you have .. the more updates you do per week and the more content you add.

i voted free cause i like bbw's in hose/encasement and only two sites "specialize" in it and they suck as far as quality and quantity.

Is there a free site that is better than the best paysite in the selected niche ? Can a free site compete with a paysite (I mean the quality .. not traffic